Flight cancelled due to weather? When you can still get compensation

Do airlines have to pay compensation when a flight is cancelled due to weather?

In Europe and the UK, the answer turns on proof. Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 lets an airline skip compensation when extraordinary circumstances caused the cancellation and couldn't have been avoided with all reasonable measures. Recital 14 of the same regulation names weather conditions incompatible with the operation of the flight as one example.

Courts apply a two-part test, first set out by the Court of Justice of the EU in Wallentin-Hermann (C-549/07). The event must fall outside the airline's normal activity and sit beyond its actual control. On top of that, the airline has to show that reasonable measures couldn't have saved your flight.

The burden of proof sits with the airline from start to finish. A word on a cancellation email proves very little. The carrier has to show what the weather was, where it struck and how it stopped your particular aircraft from flying.

UK261 uses the same wording, because the UK kept the EU text after Brexit. In the US and Canada, the cause of a weather cancellation matters far less. Neither country pays fixed cash compensation for weather. Passengers there fight over refunds and rebooking.

In our claims, the reason code on the email is the airline's opening position. We ask for the cause in writing for your exact flight number and date. A specific answer is much harder to stretch than a one-word label.

Which types of bad weather count as extraordinary circumstances under EC 261 and UK261?

Today's EC 261 has no list of qualifying storms. Courts look at how severe the weather was, how foreseeable it was at that airport in that season, and whether it actually reached your flight. Here's how the common types usually play out.

Source: Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, recital 14 and Article 5(3); Court of Justice of the EU, C-12/11, C-74/19 and C-108/26; German Federal Court of Justice, X ZR 146/23. Courts decide each case on its own facts.

From 23 October 2027, the reformed regulation adds a written list. Its annex names "meteorological conditions" that are incompatible with the safe operation of the flight, along with weather damage to the aircraft. It also covers a contaminated runway, as long as the airline didn't cause the contamination. The list is set out in Regulation (EU) 2026/2202. Events on it still count only when the airline proves the link to your flight.

Foreseeability is where plenty of weather defences crack. Germany's Federal Court of Justice has treated routine de-icing at a cold-weather airport as part of an airline's normal job. A blizzard that shuts the runway still qualifies. Our guide to what airlines owe you when a winter storm cancels your flight walks through those snow rulings in detail.

The phrase we test every weather claim against is "safe operation". We pull the official airport weather reports for your scheduled departure and arrival times. Light rain and a stiff breeze rarely come close.

What did the CJEU decide in October 2026 about weather-related air traffic control restrictions?

The newest weather ruling in EU law came on 8 October 2026, in case C-108/26. It changes how airlines can use one of their favourite explanations.

In July 2023, a passenger's flight from Izmir to Warsaw landed more than three hours late. Earlier that day, the same aircraft had flown from Katowice to Izmir and been held by an air traffic management decision. That decision followed airspace restrictions over Hungary and Romania, imposed because of bad weather. A technical fault then took more than two hours to fix in Izmir.

In January 2026, the EU's General Court had backed a broad reading. It held that an air traffic management decision could count as extraordinary whatever the reason behind it. The Court of Justice reviewed that ruling and set it aside. According to the CJEU's press release, this was the first time it had ever overturned a General Court preliminary ruling.

Airlines face air traffic decisions as a matter of routine, the judges said. A decision alone therefore can't excuse a delay. The airline has to identify the event that triggered it and show that event was extraordinary. Bad weather qualifies when it's severe enough to stop the flight operating safely and on its original schedule.

The ruling also confirmed some arithmetic that cuts both ways. Sometimes a delay comes partly from an extraordinary event and partly from something else. In that case, the time the extraordinary event caused is deducted from the total. If what's left is under three hours, there's no compensation. If the airline's own technical fault pushes the remainder past three hours, the claim survives.

The case concerned a delay. Cancellations run through the same extraordinary-circumstances test. A "weather-related ATC restriction" on your cancellation email now needs the same backing.

Since this ruling, an airline that can only point to a restriction, with nothing on the reason behind it, has a much thinner defence. We ask which restriction applied to your flight, when it was issued and what caused it.

Can an airline blame weather at another airport or on an earlier flight for a cancellation?

Yes, within limits. Aircraft fly several sectors a day. A storm in Frankfurt at breakfast can ground a flight from Lisbon at dinner. In Transportes Aéreos Portugueses (C-74/19), the CJEU allowed airlines to rely on an extraordinary event that hit an earlier flight by the same aircraft. They must prove a direct causal link between that event and your disruption.

The same judgment added a second condition that matters on weather days. To use the defence, the airline must use every resource it has to reroute you quickly and sensibly. According to the court's 2020 press release, that includes looking at direct or indirect flights run by other airlines. Rebooking you on its own next service two days later may fall short.

The causal chain weakens with time and distance. Picture a cancellation the morning after the storm cleared, at an airport the storm never touched. The airline would need a clear explanation of how the earlier weather still grounded your plane. From 23 October 2027, Article 6c of the reformed regulation writes this direct-link rule into law. It also puts the burden of proving the link on the airline.

Note your aircraft's registration if you can see it. It lets us trace where the plane spent the day before your cancellation. Sometimes the trail shows an aircraft parked and ready while the airline decided which routes to restore first.

How much compensation is a cancelled flight worth if the airline's weather excuse fails?

If the airline can't prove extraordinary circumstances, EC 261 pays a fixed sum per passenger based on distance. It's €250 for flights up to 1,500 km and €400 for longer flights within the EU or other flights of 1,500 to 3,500 km. Beyond that, the payment is €600. UK261 pays £220, £350 or £520 on the same distance bands.

For cancellations, the notice you got matters too. Compensation only applies when the airline told you less than 14 days before departure. Even then, a replacement flight close enough to your original times can remove the claim. The windows tighten once the reformed EU rules apply.

Source: Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, Article 5(1)(c); Regulation (EU) 2026/2202, new Article 5(5). UK261 keeps the current rules in the middle column.

Weather cancellations nearly always come at short notice. That means the 14-day rule rarely protects the airline. Long-haul payments can also be halved when rerouting gets you to your destination within a set window. That's how a €600 claim sometimes becomes €300.

Check the times on any replacement flight against the table before you accept it. A seat that lands just inside the window wipes out the compensation, even when the cause was within the airline's control.

What must an airline provide after a weather cancellation in Europe or the UK when no compensation is due?

Extraordinary circumstances switch off one right only, the fixed cash payment. Everything else in EC 261 and UK261 keeps running. Under Articles 8 and 9, the airline still owes you:

• a refund of the unused ticket within seven days, rerouting at the earliest opportunity, or rerouting later on a date that suits you
• meals and refreshments in reasonable proportion to the wait
• two phone calls, emails or similar messages
• a hotel and transfers when you're stuck overnight

The choice between refund and rerouting is yours. A voucher only replaces a cash refund when you agree to it in writing. If the airline nudges you towards credit, it pays to know how to get a cash refund for a cancelled flight before you tap accept.

Under today's rules, care has no time limit and no cost cap. In McDonagh v Ryanair (C-12/11), Ryanair argued the 2010 volcanic ash closures were too big for the duty of care to apply. The CJEU rejected that argument. The passenger recovered €1,129.41 for a week of meals, transport and hotels.

That changes for EU flights from 23 October 2027. When the cause is extraordinary, the airline may limit hotel stays to three nights. The cap doesn't apply to passengers with specific needs, as long as the airline knows about them. That covers disabled passengers, pregnant women, infants, unaccompanied minors and people needing medical assistance. If the airline hasn't offered rerouting within three hours, you'll also be able to book your own. Costs are repaid up to 400% of the ticket price.

UK261 stays as it is unless Parliament changes it. UK departures therefore keep care without a three-night cap.

When the airline offers nothing, book something reasonable yourself and keep itemised receipts. Screenshot the moment help failed to appear, such as an empty service desk or an unanswered chat. That evidence makes expense claims much easier to win.

What are your rights when a US airline cancels your flight because of weather?

US federal law pays no fixed compensation for any cancellation, whatever the cause. What it does give you is a firm refund right. Under the DOT's refund rule in 14 CFR Part 260, a cancelled or significantly changed flight earns you a refund. You only need to decline the rebooking, voucher or credit. Weather makes no difference.

Refunds must be automatic and go back to your original payment method. Card purchases are due within 7 business days and other payment methods within 20 calendar days. The DOT's refund page explains what counts as a significant change, such as a 3-hour shift on a domestic flight or 6 hours on an international one.

Weather hurts US passengers most on meals and hotels. The large airlines publish meal and hotel commitments on the DOT's customer service dashboard. Those promises cover disruptions within the airline's control. Weather sits outside it. Anything you get during a storm comes from goodwill or the airline's own policy.

The DOT has also paused enforcement of refunds for flights that are merely renumbered, until 7 July 2027. A flight that's genuinely cancelled, or moved by 3 hours or more on a domestic route, still carries the full refund right.

Flying across the Atlantic? A flight from the US into the EU on an EU airline falls under EC 261, as does every flight departing an EU airport. A weather cancellation on those routes follows the European rules above.

The costly mistake on US weather days is tapping "accept" on the automatic rebooking. Taking the new flight or a travel credit counts as accepting alternative transport. That switches the refund off. Make the call before you tap.

How do weather cancellation rights compare in the EU, UK, US and Canada?

The same storm produces very different entitlements depending on where you fly and who operates the plane. Here's how a genuine weather cancellation plays out under each regime, including the EU changes due in October 2027.

Source: Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, Articles 5, 8 and 9; Regulation (EU) 2026/2202; UK261; 14 CFR Part 260; Air Passenger Protection Regulations (SOR/2019-150), section 18.

Canada treats weather as outside the airline's control under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations. The airline must find you a confirmed seat on its own or a partner's flight leaving within 48 hours of your original departure. If it can't, you choose between a refund and a new booking, which large airlines must arrange on any carrier.

The Canadian rules in force today were last amended in September 2022. Ottawa has been consulting on a tougher regime since 2023. Check for changes before you fly.

A single trip can fall under two regimes at once. A flight from Toronto to London on a British airline, for example, is covered by Canada's rules and by UK261. We check which regime gives you more before we file anything.

How can you check whether weather really caused your flight cancellation?

You can test an airline's weather story with free, public information. Gather it on the day, while it's easy to find:

• Ask for the cancellation reason in writing for your flight number and date and screenshot every app notice and email.
• Note when you were told. The notice period decides whether compensation is possible at all.
• Look up the official airport weather reports, known as METARs, for your scheduled departure and arrival times. Aviation weather archives publish them free.
• Check whether other airlines flew the same route around the same time. A rival departure that left on schedule weakens any safety argument.
• Write down the aircraft registration if you can see it. It shows where the plane was all day.
• Keep every receipt for meals, transport and hotels.

From 23 October 2027, EU airlines must pay or reply within 30 days of your claim. A refusal must name the extraordinary circumstance it relies on and explain the causal link and the reasonable measures taken. Claims will also need to reach the airline within nine months of the flight, far shorter than today's national time limits.

If the airline still says no and the explanation doesn't hold up, take it further. Depending on the country, that means a national enforcement body, an approved dispute scheme or the courts. Our guide to which regulator handles your complaint and when to escalate covers where to go.

Airport weather reports are blunt evidence. A cancellation blamed on fog looks very different next to a report showing more than 10 km of visibility at your departure time.

Is it worth claiming compensation for a flight cancelled due to weather?

Often, yes, and always for the parts the weather can't touch. A genuine storm can excuse an airline from the €250 to €600 payment. It never cancels your refund or your rebooking. In Europe and the UK, it never cancels your meals and hotel either. If you paid those costs yourself, you can claim them back with receipts.

The compensation itself is also more winnable than the email suggests. Airlines carry the burden of proof. Since October 2026, they can't rest on an air traffic restriction without proving the weather behind it. They can only blame an earlier flight's storm through a direct causal chain.

If a weather cancellation wrecked a trip in the last few years, it deserves a second look. Run your flight through Gyro for a free eligibility check or connect your inbox to Autopilot and let us find the cancellations you've forgotten. We test the weather defence and deal with the airline for you. You keep 100% of whatever the airline pays.

Find out if the weather excuse really holds

If your flight was cancelled at short notice, you may be owed €250 to €600 under EC 261 or £220 to £520 under UK261. Your meal and hotel costs come on top. Gyro checks your eligibility for free. You keep 100% of whatever the airline pays.

• Free eligibility check in 60 seconds
• Meal, hotel and transport expenses included in the claim
• Autopilot scans 3 years of your inbox for weather cancellations you wrote off

Check what you're owed